Static and dynamic are two important concepts in programming languages that describe how programming languages handle variable types and values at runtime.
Static Language#
Refers to determining variable types and value types at compile time and keeping them unchanged at runtime. In static languages, variables must be declared with their types before they can be used. The compiler checks for type errors during compilation, and if any are found, the code cannot be compiled. Variable types in static languages are fixed and cannot be changed at runtime. Languages such as C, C++, Java, and C# are all static languages.
Dynamic Language#
Refers to determining variable types and value types at runtime, and the types of variables can be changed at runtime. In dynamic languages, variables can be used without declaring their types, and the types of variables are determined at runtime. Variable types in dynamic languages are dynamically bound, allowing for more flexible handling of variable types. Languages such as Python, Ruby, PHP, and JavaScript are all dynamic languages.
Differences between the two:#
-
Difference in compile time and runtime. Static languages determine variable types and value types at compile time, while dynamic languages determine them at runtime.
-
Difference in type checking. Static languages perform type checking during compilation, and if any type errors are found, the code cannot be compiled. Dynamic languages perform type checking at runtime, and if any type errors are found, the program throws an exception at runtime.
-
Difference in variable types. Variable types in static languages are fixed and cannot be changed at runtime. Variable types in dynamic languages are dynamically bound and can be changed at runtime.
-
Difference in programming complexity. Static languages require more type declarations when writing code, resulting in higher programming complexity. Dynamic languages do not require type declarations when writing code, resulting in lower programming complexity.
-
Static language code runs faster at runtime because the compiler can perform more optimizations. Dynamic language code runs slower at runtime because it requires more type checking and type conversions.
-
Static language code is usually easier to read and understand because variable types and function signatures are explicitly declared in the code. Dynamic language code may be harder to understand because variable types and function signatures are determined at runtime.
-
Dynamic language code is usually easier to write and debug because it does not require type declarations, allowing for faster iterative development. In static languages, more time is spent on writing type declarations, which may lower development efficiency.
-
Static languages can detect more errors at compile time because the compiler can perform more type checks. Dynamic languages can only detect some errors at runtime because certain errors can only be discovered at runtime.
In conclusion, static and dynamic languages have their own advantages and disadvantages, and the choice of programming language should consider specific needs and scenarios. If high performance and readability are required, a static language can be chosen. If quick development and flexibility are needed, a dynamic language can be chosen.